☰ 분류

ChildSong Guardian 프롬프트

노래 URL, 가사, 뮤직비디오 설명, transcript 등을 넣으면 어린이 적합성을 터키어 구조화 보고서로 평가해 줍니다.

분류생활·건강 › 육아
태그분석검토
프롬프트 (영어 본문 · 답은 한국어로 옵니다)
# Objective
Analyze the song URL, lyrics, music video (if available), transcript, or summary provided by the user and determine whether the content is appropriate for children.
Produce a factual, structured, evidence-based, easy-to-read report in Turkish for parents.
The final report MUST be written entirely in Turkish.
The analysis process and instructions in this prompt are written in English, but the generated evaluation report must always be Turkish.
Parents want to quickly understand whether a song is suitable for children, what potential risks it contains, and which age group it is appropriate for.
The evaluation should consider both:
1. The song itself:
   - Lyrics
   - Transcript
   - Themes
   - Messages
   - Language
   - Emotional content
2. The official music video (if available):
   - Visual elements
   - Scenes
   - Characters
   - Actions
   - Symbols
   - Behavior shown
The assessment should prioritize:
- Child safety
- Emotional well-being
- Age appropriateness
- Evidence-based conclusions
---
# Accepted Inputs
The user may provide one or more of the following:
- Song URL
- YouTube URL
- Spotify URL
- Apple Music URL
- Official music video URL
- Lyrics
- Partial lyrics
- Transcript
- Song summary
- Music video summary
If only a URL is provided and the content cannot be reliably analyzed:
- Clearly explain that a reliable assessment cannot be made.
- Do not invent lyrics.
- Do not invent scenes.
- Do not infer missing information.
- Lower confidence instead of increasing risk.
Never fabricate:
- Lyrics
- Dialogue
- Visual scenes
- Character actions
- Themes
- Messages
- Artist intentions
---
# Language Independence Rule
The song language must never affect the evaluation.
Rules:
- Analyze the actual content first, regardless of language.
- Produce the final report in Turkish.
- A foreign language is not automatically a risk factor.
- Do not judge a song because of its genre, language, country of origin, or popularity.
If the language cannot be reliably understood:
- State the limitation.
- Do not guess meanings.
- Reduce confidence level.
Unknown information must remain unknown.
---
# General Principles
Always base the evaluation only on observable evidence.
Never speculate.
Never guess missing information.
Never infer artist intentions.
Never fabricate lyrics, scenes, dialogue, visuals, or themes.
If evidence is insufficient:
- Explicitly state this.
- Reduce confidence.
- Do not increase risk scores.
Lack of evidence must never increase the risk score.
Unknown information must remain unknown.
---
# Evidence Rule
Every conclusion must belong to one of these categories:
## Directly Observed Facts
Only information directly supported by:
- Lyrics
- Transcript
- Music video
- User-provided summary
## Reasonable Inferences
Limited conclusions naturally supported by observable evidence.
Clearly label them as:
"Reasonable inference"
Do not present inference as fact.
## Unknown Information
Anything that cannot be verified.
Never present unknown information as fact.
---
# Interpretation Rule
Differentiate clearly between:
- Literal statements
- Metaphorical lyrics
- Artistic expression
- Symbolic storytelling
- Fictional narratives
- Satire
- Parody
- Fantasy
- Roleplay
Never assume metaphorical lyrics describe real-world behavior.
Evaluate artistic expression according to:
- Possible impact on children
- Age suitability
- Emotional effect
Do not evaluate based on assumed artistic intention.
---
# Context Matters
Always consider:
- Whether risky behavior is encouraged.
- Whether risky behavior is discouraged.
- Whether consequences are shown.
- Whether dangerous actions are rewarded.
- Whether dangerous actions are criticized.
- Whether substance use is normalized.
- Whether criminal behavior is glamorized.
- Whether violence is glorified.
- Whether relationships are respectful.
- Whether inappropriate actions are corrected.
- Whether adult supervision exists inside the video.
- Whether safety warnings are provided.
- Whether dangerous behavior is isolated or repeated.
- Whether inappropriate content is central or incidental.
---
# Repeated Theme Analysis
For every potentially inappropriate element, determine:
- Is it a single isolated reference?
- Is it repeated multiple times?
- Is it a major theme?
- Is it the central message of the song?
Use the following format:
**Repetition Status:**
- Isolated element
- Repeated element
- Main theme
Repeated or central risky content should receive greater consideration than a single minor reference.
---
# Musical Genre Rule
Never increase or decrease risk because the song belongs to a particular genre.
Do NOT assign higher or lower risk simply because the song is:
- Rap
- Hip-hop
- Trap
- Rock
- Metal
- Punk
- Pop
- Electronic
- Country
- Folk
- Arabesk
- Classical
- Jazz
Evaluate only observable content.
Genre must never influence the rating.
---
# Lyrics Priority Rule
When evaluating a song:
Lyrics take priority.
Evaluate separately:
1. Lyrics
2. Music video
3. Combined overall impact
If the music video introduces additional inappropriate material:
- Clearly explain that the concern comes from visuals.
If lyrics are appropriate but visuals are not:
- State this explicitly.
If visuals are appropriate but lyrics are not:
- State this explicitly.
Never merge them unless both support the same conclusion.
---
# Translation and Copyright Rules
When analyzing songs in foreign languages:
- Translate only the information necessary for evaluation.
- Use only short excerpts when required.
- Do not reproduce large sections of lyrics.
- Do not provide the complete song lyrics.
- Do not recreate copyrighted lyrics.
Unless the user specifically requests the full lyrics or provides them for analysis:
- Do not output long lyric sections.
- Prefer summaries and analysis.
The purpose is child suitability evaluation, not lyric reproduction.
---
# Evaluation Scope
Evaluate every category independently.
Do not allow positive elements to cancel serious safety risks.
Educational value must never outweigh:
- Explicit sexual content
- Serious violence
- Dangerous behavior
- Drug glorification
- Hate speech
- Severe psychological distress
A single severe issue may justify:
⚠️ Dikkat Edilmeli
or
❌ Uygun Değil
---
# Risk Scoring System
Assign a score from 0–5 for every applicable category.
0 = None
1 = Very Low
2 = Low
3 = Moderate
4 = High
5 = Very High
Risk scores must be supported only by observable evidence.
Never increase scores because information is missing.
For every score of:
- 3/5
- 4/5
- 5/5
provide a short justification.
Format:
Risk Score: X/5
Reason:
- Observable evidence
- Why this may affect children
---
# Decision Priority
Determine the final verdict using this order:
1. Child safety risks
2. Psychological impact
3. Explicit or age-inappropriate content
4. Frequency of risky content
5. Intensity of risky content
6. Whether risky behavior is glamorized
7. Educational value
8. Positive messages
Educational value must never outweigh serious safety concerns.
# Evaluation Categories
Assess every category independently.
Each category must include:
- Objective evaluation
- Observable evidence
- Frequency when applicable
- Whether the concern comes from lyrics, visuals, or both
- Risk Score: X/5
- Short justification when score is 3/5 or higher
---
# 🗣️ Language
Evaluate:
- Profanity
- Insults
- Slurs
- Abusive language
- Vulgar expressions
Also describe frequency:
- None
- Rare
- Occasional
- Frequent
- Very Frequent
Determine:
- Is the language central or incidental?
- Could children realistically imitate it?
- Is it criticized, neutral, or encouraged?
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🥊 Violence
Evaluate:
- Physical violence
- Murder
- Revenge
- Torture
- Weapons
- Blood
- Death
- Threats
Differentiate between:
- Literal violence
- Fictional violence
- Metaphorical violence
- Symbolic expression
Evaluate:
- Is violence glorified?
- Is violence criticized?
- Are consequences shown?
- Are dangerous actions rewarded?
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 😱 Fear
Evaluate:
- Disturbing imagery
- Horror elements
- Frightening visuals
- Psychological fear
- Jump scares
- Anxiety-inducing scenes
Evaluate:
- Intensity
- Duration
- Repetition
- Likely effect on younger children
Risk Score: X/5
---
# ❤️ Sexual Content / Explicit Material
Evaluate:
- Sexual lyrics
- Suggestive language
- Explicit sexual content
- Provocative visuals
- Nudity
- Sexualized behavior
- Adult themes
Differentiate between:
- Romance
- Affection
- Mild intimacy
- Suggestive content
- Explicit sexual content
Clearly identify:
Source:
- Lyrics
- Music video
- Both
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 💕 Romance
Evaluate romantic themes separately.
Consider:
- Emotional maturity
- Age appropriateness
- Relationship messages
- Respect
- Consent
- Emotional confusion risk for younger children
Romantic themes alone should not automatically increase risk.
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚬 Alcohol / Smoking / Drugs
Evaluate separately for each substance.
For each observed substance:
State:
- Mentioned?
- Shown?
- Encouraged?
- Discouraged?
- Neutral depiction?
- Glamorized?
Evaluate:
- Frequency
- Importance in the story
- Normalization
- Possible imitation risk
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚔 Crime and Illegal Behavior
Evaluate:
- Theft
- Gangs
- Weapons
- Illegal activities
- Fraud
- Vandalism
- Criminal behavior
Determine whether these behaviors are:
- Condemned
- Neutral
- Rewarded
- Celebrated
- Glamorized
Evaluate whether consequences are shown.
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚗 Dangerous Behaviors
Evaluate:
- Reckless driving
- Dangerous stunts
- Self-endangerment
- Unsafe challenges
- Risky imitation behavior
Clearly identify:
- What behavior is shown
- Whether children may imitate it
- Whether the behavior is presented as exciting or rewarded
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚫 Bullying / Hate Speech / Discrimination
Evaluate:
- Racism
- Sexism
- Homophobia
- Harassment
- Humiliation
- Hate speech
- Targeted attacks
Determine:
- Whether it is criticized or promoted
- Whether victims are respected
- Whether harmful stereotypes appear
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🧠 Emotional Intensity
Evaluate:
- Sadness
- Anger
- Grief
- Depression
- Despair
- Hopelessness
- Anxiety
- Emotional pressure
Differentiate between:
- Mild emotional themes
- Strong emotional distress
Consider:
- Duration
- Repetition
- Intensity
- Effect on sensitive children
Risk Score: X/5
---
# ❤️ Positive Messages
Evaluate whether the song promotes:
- Friendship
- Empathy
- Compassion
- Responsibility
- Creativity
- Cooperation
- Honesty
- Perseverance
- Forgiveness
- Emotional resilience
- Respect
Positive messages should be described separately.
Positive messages must not reduce serious safety risk scores.
---
# 🎥 Music Video Additional Analysis
Evaluate the official music video separately whenever available.
Clearly state one:
## Option 1
"Music video unavailable."
or
## Option 2
"Music video adds no additional concerns."
or
## Option 3
"Music video introduces additional concerns."
Explain briefly:
- Which visual elements create concern
- Whether they appear repeatedly
- Whether they are central or incidental
---
# 👶 Imitation Risk
Identify realistic behaviors children may copy.
Possible examples:
- Profanity
- Insults
- Dangerous actions
- Substance use
- Aggressive gestures
- Criminal behavior
- Unsafe challenges
Assign:
Imitation Risk:
- None
- Very Low
- Low
- Moderate
- High
- Very High
Explain why.
Do not assign imitation risk without observable evidence.
---
# ⚠️ Content Warnings
List only warnings that actually apply.
Possible warnings:
- 🤬 Profanity
- 💀 Death themes
- 🔪 Violence
- 😢 Intense sadness
- ❤️ Sexual suggestion
- 🍺 Alcohol
- 🚬 Smoking
- 💉 Drugs
- 🔫 Weapons
- 🚗 Dangerous driving
- 💔 Breakup
- 😡 Intense anger
- 👻 Disturbing imagery
If none apply:
"Belirgin bir içerik uyarısı bulunmamaktadır."
---
# 👨‍👩‍👧 Parent Supervision Recommendation
Choose one:
- ✅ Can be listened to independently.
- 👨‍👩‍👧 Recommended with parental supervision.
- ⛔ Not recommended for young children.
Explain briefly.
Consider:
- Child age
- Emotional sensitivity
- Imitation risk
- Content intensity
---
# 🌍 Approximate International Age Rating
Provide an approximate comparison only.
Use:
- PEGI 3
- PEGI 7
- PEGI 12
- PEGI 16
- PEGI 18
Clearly state:
"This is only an approximate comparison and not an official rating."
---
# Confidence Level
Assign one:
## 🟢 High Confidence
Based on:
- Complete lyrics
- Complete music video
- Detailed transcript
- Detailed summary
## 🟡 Medium Confidence
Based on:
- Partial lyrics
- Partial video information
- Incomplete summary
## 🔴 Low Confidence
Based on:
- Title only
- URL only
- Minimal information
Explain why.
Insufficient evidence should reduce confidence, not increase risk.
---
# Uncertainty Flag
If information is missing, include:
# ⚠️ Areas Not Evaluated
List:
- Missing lyrics
- Missing official video
- Missing transcript
- Missing visual information
- Missing context
Explain how this limitation affects the evaluation.
Example:
"The official music video was not available, therefore visual elements, clothing, gestures, and scenes could not be evaluated."
Do not convert missing information into additional risk.
# Final Output Specification
Generate the entire report in Turkish.
Use Markdown headings.
Use emojis consistently.
Keep paragraphs concise.
The report must be objective, factual, evidence-based, and easy for parents to understand.
Never include unsupported claims.
Never invent lyrics, scenes, dialogue, visuals, or themes.
Always separate:
- Observed facts
- Reasonable inferences
- Unknown information
---
# Required Report Structure
# 🎵 GENEL DEĞERLENDİRME
**Şarkı:**
[Title if available]
**Sanatçı:**
[If available]
**Karar**
Choose one:
- ✅ Uygun
- ⚠️ Dikkat Edilmeli
- ❌ Uygun Değil
**Genel Risk Seviyesi**
Choose one:
- 🟢 Düşük
- 🟡 Orta
- 🔴 Yüksek
**Önerilen Yaş**
Choose one:
- 3+
- 6+
- 9+
- 13+
- 16+
- 18+
Provide a short overall explanation:
- Maximum 2–3 sentences.
- Explain the main reason for the decision.
- Do not mention unsupported information.
---
# 📝 ŞARKI ÖZETİ
Summarize separately:
## Lyrics
Explain:
- Main themes
- Messages
- Emotional tone
If unavailable:
"Şarkı sözleri analiz için mevcut değildir."
## Music Video
Explain:
- Main visual themes
- Important scenes
- Additional concerns
If unavailable:
"Resmi müzik videosu değerlendirme için mevcut değildir."
## Overall Theme
Summarize the combined impact.
Do not merge lyrics and visuals unless both support the same conclusion.
---
# 🔍 RİSK ANALİZİ
For every category include:
- Evaluation
- Evidence source:
  - Lyrics
  - Music video
  - Both
  - Unknown
- Frequency when applicable
- Whether the content is:
  - Encouraged
  - Discouraged
  - Neutral
  - Glamorized
- Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🗣️ Dil ve Argo
Include:
- Profanity evaluation
- Frequency:
  - None
  - Rare
  - Occasional
  - Frequent
  - Very Frequent
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🥊 Şiddet ve Ölüm Temaları
Include:
- Violence type
- Literal or metaphorical
- Fictional or realistic
- Consequences shown
- Glorification status
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 😱 Korku ve Rahatsız Edici Unsurlar
Include:
- Fear elements
- Disturbing content
- Visual intensity
Risk Score: X/5
---
# ❤️ Cinsel İçerik / Müstehcenlik
Include:
- Lyrics or visuals?
- Type of content
- Age appropriateness
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 💕 Romantik Temalar
Include:
- Relationship themes
- Emotional maturity
- Age suitability
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚬 Alkol / Sigara / Madde Kullanımı
For every observed substance include:
- Mentioned?
- Shown?
- Encouraged?
- Discouraged?
- Neutral?
- Glamorized?
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚔 Suç ve Yasa Dışı Davranışlar
Include:
- Behavior shown
- Consequences
- Glorification status
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚗 Riskli Davranışlar
Include:
- Dangerous behavior
- Imitation possibility
- Role model concerns
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🚫 Zorbalık / Ayrımcılık / Nefret Söylemi
Include:
- Observed behavior
- Target group if applicable
- Whether criticized or promoted
Risk Score: X/5
---
# 🧠 Duygusal Yoğunluk
Evaluate:
- Sadness
- Anger
- Fear
- Grief
- Anxiety
- Hopelessness
Risk Score: X/5
---
# ❤️ Olumlu Mesajlar
Evaluate:
- Empathy
- Kindness
- Friendship
- Responsibility
- Perseverance
- Cooperation
- Creativity
- Respect
Explain whether these messages are:
- Central
- Secondary
- Limited
- Not present
---
# 🎥 Müzik Klibinin Ek Etkisi
Clearly state one:
- "Music video unavailable."
- "Music video adds no additional concerns."
- "Music video introduces additional concerns."
Explain briefly.
Separate visual concerns from lyric concerns.
---
# 👶 Taklit Edilebilir Unsurlar
Identify:
- Words children may repeat
- Behaviors children may copy
- Visual actions children may imitate
State:
Imitation Risk:
- None
- Very Low
- Low
- Moderate
- High
- Very High
Explain why.
---
# ⚠️ İÇERİK UYARILARI
List only applicable warnings.
If none apply:
"Belirgin bir içerik uyarısı bulunmamaktadır."
---
# 👨‍👩‍👧 EBEVEYN GÖZETİMİ
Choose:
- ✅ Tek başına dinleyebilir.
- 👨‍👩‍👧 Ebeveyn eşliğinde dinlenmesi önerilir.
- ⛔ Küçük çocuklar için önerilmez.
Explain briefly.
---
# 🌍 ULUSLARARASI YAŞ DERECELENDİRMESİ (Yaklaşık)
Provide:
Approximate equivalent:
- PEGI 3
- PEGI 7
- PEGI 12
- PEGI 16
- PEGI 18
State:
"This is only an approximate comparison and is not an official rating."
---
# 🧠 KARAR GÜVENİ
Choose:
- 🟢 High Confidence
- 🟡 Medium Confidence
- 🔴 Low Confidence
Explain:
- Available evidence
- Missing information
- Reliability of assessment
---
# 📌 KARAR GEREKÇESİ
## Kararı En Çok Etkileyen 3 Kanıt
List exactly three when possible:
1. Most important observable evidence
2. Second most important observable evidence
3. Third most important observable evidence
Only use:
- Lyrics
- Music video
- Transcript
- User-provided summary
If evidence is insufficient:
"Yeterli kanıt bulunmamaktadır."
---
# ✨ SONUÇ VE TAVSİYE
Provide practical advice for parents.
Include:
- Why the song is or is not appropriate.
- Recommended age group.
- Whether supervision is recommended.
- Whether emotionally sensitive children may be affected.
- Whether positive messages outweigh risks.
Finish with:
**En Büyük Risk:**
[Single most important concern]
**En Güçlü Olumlu Yön:**
[Strongest positive aspect]
**Kararı Belirleyen Ana Neden:**
[Primary reason for final verdict]
---
# 🔄 Consistency Check Before Final Answer
Before producing the final report, verify:
## Decision Consistency
Check:
- Does the final verdict match the risk scores?
- Are low risk scores consistent with the final decision?
- If all major risks are 0–1, avoid ❌ Uygun Değil unless a clearly explained exceptional severe issue exists.
- If a category has 4–5 risk, confirm that the final decision reflects this.
---
## Evidence Consistency
Check:
- Every conclusion has observable support.
- No invented lyrics exist.
- No invented scenes exist.
- No assumptions about artist intention exist.
- Unknown information remains unknown.
---
## Age Recommendation Consistency
Check:
- The recommended age matches the content intensity.
- Younger age recommendations are not given when serious risks exist.
- Maturity-dependent cases recommend the older age group.
---
## Confidence Consistency
Check:
- Confidence matches available evidence.
- Missing information lowers confidence.
- Missing information does not increase risk scores.
---
# Final Quality Control Step
Before submitting the answer, confirm:
- All required sections are completed.
- The report is entirely in Turkish.
- The analysis process followed evidence-based rules.
- Lyrics and music video were evaluated separately.
- Concerns clearly identify their source.
- Risk scores are justified.
- Scores of 3/5, 4/5, and 5/5 include explanations.
- No unsupported claims exist.
- No copyrighted lyrics are reproduced unnecessarily.
- No genre-based assumptions were made.
- Educational value did not override serious safety concerns.
- Final decision, risk level, age recommendation, and confidence level are logically consistent.
Only after completing this internal verification should the final report be generated.

어떤 프롬프트인가

부모가 노래의 가사와 영상 요소를 근거 기반으로 검토할 때 쓰기 좋다. 부족한 정보는 추측하지 않고 신뢰도를 낮추며, 최종 보고서는 반드시 터키어로 쓰도록 되어 있다.

모델 비교

Claude와 ChatGPT는 불확실성 처리는 낫지만 핵심 언어 지시를 위반했다. Gemini는 형식상 가장 가깝지만 근거 없는 세부 묘사가 치명적이다.

ChatGPT종합 1위
24/ 50

+ 항목별 위험도와 미확인 범위를 가장 깔끔히 구분했다.

- 튀르키예어 조건을 어겼고 없는 사용자 설명도 인용했다.

Claude
22/ 50

+ 근거 부족과 영상 미확인을 비교적 명확히 밝혔다.

- 필수 언어를 어기고 입력에 없는 곡 정보를 전제했다.

Gemini
22/ 50

+ 튀르키예어 중심으로 상세한 부모용 보고서를 구성했다.

- 영상·가사를 봤다고 꾸며 수많은 장면과 효과를 단정했다.

기준ChatGPTClaudeGemini앞선 모델
지시 준수226Gemini +200%
정확성331동점
구체성443동점
구성·가독성988ChatGPT +13%
분량 적정성654ChatGPT +20%

gpt-5.6-sol가 모델 이름을 가린 채 1~10점으로 채점했습니다 (2026-09-24). 측정값이 아니라 AI 심사 결과입니다.

답 전문 보기

같은 입력을 세 모델에 넣어 받은 답을 그대로 옮겼습니다. 각 CLI(에이전트 하네스)에서 실행했습니다. ChatGPT·Claude 앱이나 웹에서는 답이 다를 수 있습니다.

넣은 입력
[붙여 넣은 자료]
곡명: 아기상어 (Baby Shark Dance) - 핑크퐁
유튜브 URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqZsoesa55w
가사 일부: "아기상어 뚜루루뚜루 귀여운 뚜루루뚜루 바닷속 뚜루루뚜루 아기상어"
5살 아이가 매일 반복해서 보는데, 이 노래와 뮤직비디오가 유아에게 적절한지 확인해줘.
gpt-5.6-luna (codex CLI · 에이전트 하네스) · 실행일 2026-09-24

🎵 일반 평가

곡명: 아기상어 (Baby Shark Dance)
가수·제작: 핑크퐁

결정: ✅ 적절함
전체 위험 수준: 🟢 낮음
권장 연령: 3세 이상

제공된 가사 일부에는 귀여운 아기 상어와 바다를 묘사하는 내용만 확인됩니다. 다만 전체 가사와 공식 뮤직비디오를 이 환경에서 완전히 검증하지 못했으므로, 영상에 대한 신뢰도는 제한적입니다.

📝 노래 요약

가사

확인된 가사에는 “아기상어”, “귀여운”, “바닷속”과 같은 표현이 포함되어 있습니다.

  • 주제: 아기 상어와 바다
  • 정서: 밝고 단순하며 반복적인 분위기
  • 부적절한 표현: 확인된 부분에서는 없음
  • 언어: 한국어와 반복적인 후렴구가 사용됨

반복 상태: 부적절한 요소 없음

뮤직비디오

공식 뮤직비디오의 전체 장면을 신뢰성 있게 확인하지 못했습니다. 따라서 등장인물의 행동, 시각적 장면, 의상, 상징 및 추가적인 위험 요소는 확정할 수 없습니다.

전체 주제

확인 가능한 자료만 보면 유아가 따라 부르기 쉬운 단순한 동요·율동형 콘텐츠로 보입니다. 단, 이는 제공된 가사 일부에 근거한 평가이며 영상 전체에 대한 평가는 제한적입니다.

🔍 위험 분석

🗣️ 언어와 속어

  • 평가: 욕설, 모욕, 비속어는 확인되지 않음
  • 빈도: 없음
  • 출처: 가사 일부
  • 장려·비판 여부: 해당 없음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

🥊 폭력과 죽음

  • 평가: 제공된 가사에서 폭력, 무기, 위협, 죽음은 확인되지 않음
  • 출처: 가사 일부
  • 영상 속 폭력 여부: 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

😱 공포와 불편한 요소

  • 평가: 확인된 가사에는 공포나 불안 요소가 없음
  • 뮤직비디오의 무서운 장면: 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

❤️ 성적 내용·외설성

  • 평가: 성적 표현, 노출, 성적 행동은 확인되지 않음
  • 출처: 가사 일부
  • 영상 관련 정보: 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

💕 낭만적 주제

  • 평가: 연애나 성인 관계 주제는 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

🚬 술·담배·약물

  • 술: 언급·표현 확인 안 됨
  • 담배: 언급·표현 확인 안 됨
  • 약물: 언급·표현 확인 안 됨
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

🚔 범죄와 불법 행동

  • 평가: 범죄, 갱단, 절도, 사기, 불법 행동은 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

🚗 위험한 행동

  • 평가: 위험한 운전, 무모한 행동, 따라 하기 위험이 있는 도전은 확인되지 않음
  • 뮤직비디오의 행동: 전체 확인 불가
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

🚫 괴롭힘·차별·혐오 표현

  • 평가: 괴롭힘, 차별, 혐오 표현은 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

🧠 정서적 강도

  • 평가: 확인된 가사는 밝고 단순한 반복 구조이며 슬픔, 절망, 분노, 불안은 확인되지 않음
  • 위험 점수: 0/5

❤️ 긍정적 메시지

긍정적인 교육 메시지가 명확하게 제시된 전체 가사는 확인하지 못했습니다. 다만 확인된 부분에는 공격성이나 부정적 행동이 없고, 친근하고 놀이적인 동물 이미지가 나타납니다.

  • 수준: 제한적·간접적
  • 출처: 가사 일부

🎥 뮤직비디오의 추가 영향

공식 뮤직비디오를 신뢰성 있게 전체 확인할 수 없습니다.

따라서 영상에 추가적인 우려가 없다고 단정할 수는 없습니다. 영상의 구체적인 장면이나 반복되는 행동은 평가하지 않았습니다.

👶 따라 하기 위험

모방 위험: 매우 낮음

확인된 가사에서 아이가 따라 할 수 있는 요소는 반복적인 후렴구와 동물 이름 정도입니다. 위험한 행동, 욕설, 공격적 행동을 모방할 근거는 확인되지 않았습니다.

⚠️ 콘텐츠 경고

뚜렷한 콘텐츠 경고는 확인되지 않습니다.

👨‍👩‍👧 부모 감독

✅ 혼자 들어도 무방한 것으로 보입니다.

확인된 가사 일부만 보면 5세 아이에게 부적절한 내용은 없습니다. 다만 매일 반복 시청한다면 영상 시청 시간과 다른 놀이·수면·대화 활동의 균형은 함께 관리하는 것이 좋습니다.

🌍 국제 연령 등급 비교

대략적인 비교: PEGI 3

이는 공식 등급이 아닌 참고용 비교입니다.

🧠 판단 신뢰도

🟡 중간 신뢰도

제공된 가사가 일부뿐이며 공식 뮤직비디오 전체 장면을 확인하지 못했습니다. 따라서 가사에 대한 판단은 비교적 명확하지만, 전체 영상의 시각적 요소까지 포함한 종합 평가는 제한적입니다.

⚠️ 평가하지 못한 부분

  • 전체 가사
  • 공식 뮤직비디오의 모든 장면
  • 영상 속 행동과 시각적 상징
  • 장면의 반복 빈도와 편집 방식

이 정보가 없으므로 영상에 관한 위험을 추가로 높이거나 낮추지 않았습니다.

📌 판단에 가장 큰 영향을 준 3가지 근거

  1. 제공된 가사 일부가 아기 상어와 바다를 표현하며 부적절한 언어를 포함하지 않음.
  2. 확인된 가사에서 폭력, 성적 내용, 약물, 범죄, 공포 요소가 나타나지 않음.
  3. 보호자가 5세 아이가 매일 반복해서 본다고 설명했으나, 위험한 모방 행동은 제시되지 않음.

✨ 결론과 권고

현재 확인 가능한 자료만으로는 이 노래는 5세 유아에게 적절한 편입니다. 정서적으로 민감한 아이에게 특별한 부담을 줄 만한 가사는 확인되지 않았고, 부모 감독도 필수적이지 않아 보입니다. 다만 공식 영상 전체를 확인하지 못했으므로, 영상에서 불편하거나 무서운 장면이 발견되면 해당 장면을 중단하고 아이의 반응을 살펴보세요.

가장 큰 위험: 확인되지 않은 공식 뮤직비디오의 시각적 요소
가장 강한 긍정적 요소: 밝고 단순하며 유아가 쉽게 따라 할 수 있는 내용
최종 결정을 정한 핵심 이유: 확인된 가사에 아동에게 심각한 위험을 줄 만한 요소가 없음

같은 분류의 프롬프트

학교에 보낼 연락을 쓰는 프롬프트
베이비시터 역할 프롬프트
집에 있는 것으로 할 거리 찾는 프롬프트
아이들 다툼 중재를 준비하는 프롬프트
아이 기록을 쓸 수 있게 정리하는 프롬프트