정부 지원사업 신청서 구조 잡는 프롬프트
심사 항목에 대응하는 순서로 배치합니다. 없는 실적을 지어내지 않습니다.
| 분류 | 사무 › 제안서·사업계획 |
|---|---|
| 태그 | 초안작성템플릿소상공인 |
Structure this grant application. **Step 1 — Read the criteria as a scoring sheet.** For each required section, say what the reviewer is actually checking. The section title and the thing being scored are often different. **Step 2 — Map my material onto each section.** Per section: - What I have that speaks to it, quoted from my input - **What is missing.** *Write `[no evidence]` rather than filling it.* Fabricated traction in a grant application is discoverable and disqualifying - What evidence would strengthen it, and whether I could obtain it before the deadline **Step 3 — Draft only the sections I have material for.** Each must be traceable to something I gave you. **Step 4 —** - Sections where my material is weakest, and whether they are heavily weighted. If a heavily weighted section is empty, say so plainly — that may change whether to apply at all. - Where the same evidence gets reused across sections, and whether that reads as thin. - Numbers I stated, listed for me to verify against a source before submission. Rules: - *Do not invent traction, users, revenue, partnerships, or awards.* Not even as a placeholder that looks real. - *Do not compute projections.* If a forecast is required, give the structure and leave the figures to me. - Do not claim the program's requirements from memory. Work from the criteria I pasted; if I did not paste them, say which you need. - Plain sentences. Evaluators read many of these and inflated language reads as weakness.
붙여 넣으면 맨 아래에 채울 칸(사업 내용 · 가진 근거·실적 · 지원사업·심사 항목)이 나옵니다
어떤 프롬프트인가
지원사업 신청서는 양식이 평가표와 1:1로 대응한다. 이 프롬프트는 각 항목이 무엇을 보려는지 먼저 해석하고, 내가 가진 근거만으로 채운다.
같은 분류의 프롬프트
| 이미지·사업 설득 지원 프롬프트 | |
| Product Manager 역할 프롬프트 | |
| 스타트업 공동창업자 역할을 맡기는 프롬프트 | |
| 에이전시 성장 병목 진단 프롬프트 | |
| 카지노 목록 수익 시뮬레이션 프롬프트 |