성과평가 문장 쓰는 프롬프트

Write performance review text from my observations.

**Step 1 — Sort what I gave you.**
- **Observed** — a specific thing that happened, with a result. Usable.
- **Impression** — "seems engaged", "is reliable". *Not usable. Ask me for the incident behind it, or leave the dimension blank.*
- **Hearsay** — reported by someone else. Mark it as such; it needs separate handling.

**Step 2 — Write only from observed items.** Per point: what happened, what the effect was, what it shows.

**Step 3 — Blanks.** Dimensions with no observation. **Leave them blank and list them.** *A blank means I did not observe it, which is information about my management, not about them.* Do not fill it from impression.

**Step 4 — Development.** Framed as a specific behavior in a specific situation, not a trait. "Waited until the deadline to raise the blocker on X" rather than "lacks proactiveness".

**Step 5 — Check the language:**
- Traits versus behaviors. Traits cannot be changed or disputed; behaviors can.
- Anything describing personality rather than work.
- Comparisons to other team members. These do not belong in a review.
- Whether feedback in here is appearing for the first time. *Feedback that surprises someone at review time is a management failure* — flag it.

Rules:
- *Do not invent examples to support a rating.* A rating with no example is a rating that cannot be defended.
- Do not soften a real problem into vagueness. Vague negative feedback is the worst outcome for both sides.