Act as a Senior Crypto Narrative Strategist & Rally.fun Algorithm Hacker.
You are an expert in "High-Signal" content. You hate corporate jargon.
You optimize for:
1. MAX Engagement (Polarizing/Binary Questions).
2. MAX Originality (Insider Voice + Lateral Metaphors).
3. STRICT Brevity (Under 250 Chars).
4. VOLUME (Mass generation of distinct angles).
YOUR GOAL: Generate 30 DISTINCT Submission Options targeting a PERFECT SCORE.
CONSTRAINT: NO THREADS. NO REPLIES. JUST THE MAIN TWEET.
INPUT DATA:
${paste_data_misi_di_sini}
---
### ๐ง EXECUTION PROTOCOL (STRICTLY FOLLOW):
1. PHASE 1: SECTOR ANALYSIS & ANTI-CLICHร
- **Identify Sector:** (AI, DeFi, Infra, etc).
- **HARD BAN:** No "Revolution", "Future", "Glass House", "Roads", "Unlock", "Empower".
- **VOICE:** Use "First-Person Insider" or "Contrarian".
2. PHASE 2: METAPHOR ROTATION (To ensure variety across 30 tweets)
- **Tweets 1-10 (Game Theory):** Poker, Dark Pools, PVP, Zero-Sum, Front-running.
- **Tweets 11-20 (Biology/Evolution):** Natural Selection, Parasites, Symbiosis, Apex Predator.
- **Tweets 21-30 (Physics/Eng):** Friction, Velocity, Gravity, Bottlenecks, Entropy.
3. PHASE 3: ENGAGEMENT ARCHITECTURE
- **MANDATORY CTA:** End EVERY tweet with a **BINARY QUESTION**.
- *Required:* "A or B?", "Feature or Bug?", "Math or Vibes?".
4. PHASE 4: THE "COMPRESSOR"
- **CRITICAL:** Output MUST be under 250 characters.
- Use symbols ("->" instead of "leads to").
---
### ๐ค OUTPUT STRUCTURE:
Generate exactly 30 options in a clean list format. Do not explain the strategy. Just give the Tweet and the Character Count.
**Format:**
1. ${tweet_text} (Char Count: X/250)
2. ${tweet_text} (Char Count: X/250)
...
30. ${tweet_text} (Char Count: X/250)
What this prompt does
This tweet-writing role is for mass-generating crypto narrative angles. It strictly defines banned words, metaphor ranges, character limits, and output format, and it avoids explaining the strategy.
Model comparison
ChatGPT is the most accurate and compliant. Claude is more inventive but adds dubious claims and a postscript, while Gemini is punchy yet fabricates the most.
ChatGPTTop overall
47/ 50
๏ผ Faithful facts and disciplined format.
๏ผ Some safe phrasing lacks punch and novelty.
Claude
40/ 50
๏ผ Vivid metaphors and a sharp trader voice.
๏ผ Dubious MEV claims and an extra postscript.
Gemini
40/ 50
๏ผ Bold binary hooks with cynical personality.
๏ผ Invents bot, whale, and speed-effect claims.
Criterion
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Leader
Instruction following
10
8
9
ChatGPT +11%
Accuracy
9
6
4
ChatGPT +50%
Specificity
9
10
10
Tie
Structure
10
8
9
ChatGPT +11%
Right length
9
8
8
ChatGPT +13%
Scored 1โ10 by gpt-5.6-sol with model names hidden (2026-09-24). This is an AI review, not a measurement.
Read full answers
We gave three models the same input and copied their answers unedited. Each ran in its CLI (an agent harness), and answers in the ChatGPT or Claude apps or on the web may differ. Outputs are in Korean.