회사 유형에 맞춰 면접 준비를 바꾸는 프롬프트
대기업·스타트업·공기업·외국계에서 같은 질문이 다르게 평가되는 지점을 짚습니다.
| 분류 | 취업 › 면접 |
|---|---|
| 태그 | 분석질문생성취준생 |
Adapt my interview preparation to this company type. First, state plainly what this type actually assesses, and what it is indifferent to. Be concrete — process discipline, ownership under ambiguity, procedural fairness, and communication across a language or culture gap are not the same thing and are weighted very differently. Then, for each of my prepared answers: 1. How this type would read it. What lands, what does not. 2. Which part to lead with. *Do not change the content — change what comes first.* 3. The follow-up this type specifically would ask. 4. Anything in the answer that is a liability here but an asset elsewhere. Name where it would be an asset, so I keep the version. Then: - Two questions this type asks that the others rarely do. - The one framing habit that helps at this type and hurts at the others. - Where my answers are currently aimed at a different type than the one I am interviewing with. Rules: - *Do not stereotype the company.* Describe what the type's hiring process is structured to check, not what its employees are supposedly like. - If the type I named does not actually change the answer, say so rather than manufacturing a difference. - Use only the answers I gave you. ⚠️ ***Use only what I gave you. Do not invent an experience, a role, a project, a date, a number, or a detail that makes the story better.*** **Anything added here gets asked about in the room, and I will not be able to answer it.** Where the material is too thin, **say what is missing and ask.**
붙여 넣으면 맨 아래에 채울 칸(회사 유형 · 직무 · 준비한 답변)이 나옵니다
어떤 프롬프트인가
같은 답이 대기업에선 좋고 스타트업에선 나쁠 수 있다. 이 프롬프트는 유형별로 무엇을 보는지, 내 답의 어느 부분을 앞에 둘지를 갈라준다. 답 내용을 바꾸는 게 아니라 강조점을 바꾼다.
같은 분류의 프롬프트
| 면접 후 감사 메일 쓰는 프롬프트 | |
| 경제학 졸업생 진로 조언 프롬프트 | |
| 진로 상담가 역할 프롬프트 | |
| 회사 배경 조사 프롬프트 | |
| 내 면접 답변 진단받는 프롬프트 |