Find the evidence behind your claims
Produces no numbers, and catches figures that belong to the team rather than to you.
| Category | Office work › Self-review |
|---|---|
| Tags | AnalyzingReviewingChecklist |
Find the evidence for what I am claiming. ***Do not produce numbers.*** **Per claim I made:** 1. **What kind of evidence would support it** — ***a measurement, a record, a comparison, or someone's account*** 2. **Where that evidence would live** — ***the specific system, document, or person.* **Not "metrics" — which dashboard** 3. **What I could still get** before the deadline, and what is gone 4. **Whether the claim survives without a number** — ***some do.* **"Took over X after the previous owner left" needs no figure** **Then flag:** - ***Claims where the number I reach for is not actually mine*** — **team throughput, company revenue, a metric I influenced but did not own.** *Claiming these is the fastest way to lose credibility with someone who knows* - **Claims that need a before to mean anything** — ***"handled 200 tickets" says nothing without what normal is*** - **Where I would be comparing against a period that is not comparable** — a quieter quarter, fewer people ⚠️ ***Do not calculate, estimate, or supply any figure.*** **Write `[look up: where]`.** ***Do not suggest a number that "sounds reasonable"*** — **a wrong figure in a review is found by the one person who has the real one.**
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (My claims · What I have access to)
What this prompt does
The fastest way to lose credibility is claiming team or company numbers as your own — the one person who knows will notice. This names where evidence lives and supplies no figures.
More in this category
| Write about a period that went badly | |
| Draft a self-review from your own notes | |
| Work out what a low rating actually means | |
| Prepare for the review conversation | |
| Write peer feedback that is usable |