한국어
☰ Categories

Find where your sources disagree

Counts sources citing each other as one, and forbids settling anything with outside knowledge.

CategoryUsing AI › Source-grounded AI
TagsAnalyzingReviewingTable
Prompt
Compare what my sources say about this. ***Report the disagreement rather than resolving it.***

**For each source, per point:**
1. **What it claims**, ***quoted***
2. **What that claim rests on** — ***data, another source, or assertion.* **Say which**
3. **When it is from**

**Then classify every difference:**
- **Definitional** — ***check this first. Most apparent conflicts are two definitions of one word***
- **Different data** — different populations, periods, or measures
- **Superseded** — both were right; one is now old
- **Genuine disagreement** — the field has not settled it
- **One is wrong** — ***and say how that could be established from these sources***

**Also report:**
- ***What they all agree on.* **And whether that agreement is independent** — **sources citing one another are one source**
- **What only one source claims** — ***flag it.* **In a grounded set, a claim nobody else makes is either the key insight or an error, and the shape is the same**

⚠️ ***Use only the loaded sources. Do not bring in outside knowledge to settle anything*** — **that is the one thing that breaks a grounded workflow, and it is invisible in the output.** ***Do not average figures. Do not pick a side to give me a clean answer.***
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (What to compare · My sources)

What this prompt does

A grounded workflow breaks silently when the model reaches outside the sources to reconcile a conflict — the output looks the same. This stays inside and classifies each disagreement.

More in this category

AI Grounding Prompt
Report what your sources cannot answer
Build an outline from your sources
Design questions worth asking a grounded tool
Trace a claim back to the passage