한국어
☰ Categories

Find why generated video looks fake

Pins down the source of the uncanny feeling — physics, lighting, anatomy, or texture.

CategoryImage & video › Video generation
TagsReviewingAnalyzingCreator
Prompt
Diagnose why this generated video reads as fake.

Check each source separately — the feeling is vague but the causes are specific:
1. **Physics** — weight, momentum, how things fall, cloth and hair movement, objects passing through each other. The most common cause and the least fixable by wording.
2. **Lighting** — shadows that do not match the source, missing contact shadows where objects meet surfaces, light that does not change as things move.
3. **Anatomy and motion** — joints bending wrong, gait, hands, faces during speech, blinking.
4. **Texture** — surfaces too uniform, skin too smooth, no wear or dirt, everything equally in focus.
5. **Camera** — motion too perfect, no micro-instability, focus that never breathes.
6. **Timing** — actions at uniform speed with no anticipation before or settle after.

For each finding: what specifically is wrong, and **fixable by prompt / fixable in editing / model limitation.**

Then:
- The single thing a viewer notices first.
- What to change in the prompt for the fixable ones.
- ⚠️ For the model limitations: say so plainly so I stop rerolling. *Knowing to stop is worth more than another attempt.*
- Whether reducing ambition — shorter, simpler, less motion — would produce a usable shot faster than fixing this one.
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (What the video shows · What feels off · Prompt used)

What this prompt does

"Something is off" is where most reviews stop. This decomposes the feeling into specific causes and separates the fixable ones from model limits.

More in this category

1940s village life
3D Cartoon Animation: Baby Bunny Adventure
3x3 Grid Storyboarding from Photo
5x2 Reverse Construction Process - Villa Demolition Storyboard
6-Panel Storyboard Mastery