한국어
☰ Categories

Build a comparison table from several quotes

Normalizes differently-formatted quotes onto one basis and flags what each omits.

CategoryTranslate & summarize › Document summary
TagsAnalyzingTableSmall business
Prompt
Compare these quotes on a common basis.

1. **Normalize the line items.** Vendors bundle differently. Build one row per thing-being-bought and map each quote's items onto it. *Comparing totals before doing this is the most common mistake and it favors whoever bundled most aggressively.*
2. **Present in one but not others** — mark these clearly. Usually the whole story: one vendor included something the others will charge for later.
3. **Absent from all** — what my stated need requires that nobody quoted. These become change orders.
4. Comparison table: item / vendor A / vendor B / … / note.
5. Terms that affect real cost but sit outside the total: payment schedule, what triggers extra charges, revision limits, timeline penalties, what happens if scope changes.

Then:
- **Adjusted totals** — each quote normalized to the same scope, with what you added or removed to get there.
- Questions to ask each vendor before deciding.
- Where a quote is cheap because it excludes something, and where it is expensive because it includes something real.

Rules:
- *Do not estimate a price for an item a vendor did not quote.* Mark it "not quoted" — that is the finding.
- Quote the vendor's own wording where an item is ambiguous.
- Do not recommend a winner on price alone. Say what each is trading.
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (Quotes · What I need)

What this prompt does

Vendors bundle line items differently, so comparing totals misleads. This re-aligns items onto a common basis and marks what appears in only one quote.

More in this category

AIM summarized pdf
Analyze Chat History With User
Annual Summary Creator
Article Summarizer
Article Summary and Comprehension