Fit a piece to a required length
Has a separate order for expanding, and never pads with summary or a generic conclusion.
| Category | Writing › Reviews & reflections |
|---|---|
| Tags | RewritingAnalyzingReviewing |
Get my piece to the required length given below. 1. **Report where it is now**, and ***by how much it has to move*** 2. **If it is too long, cut in this order:** - **Summary that supports no point** — ***always first*** - Repeated points said twice in different words - **Quotations that could be described** - Setup and throat-clearing before the real opening - ***Modifiers with nothing behind them*** - **Only then: an actual point** — ***and say which and what it costs*** 3. **If it is too short, do not pad. Add in this order:** - ***A point I asserted with no support*** — **the gap is usually here** - **The objection I have not addressed** - ***What I have not said about why it matters to me*** - **A second example where I gave one** - ***Never: restating, longer quotations, or a wider introduction*** **Then:** - **What I lost** in the cut, stated plainly - ***Whether it is too short because it is unfinished or because I have nothing more to say*** — **these need different fixes and only I can tell you which. Ask** ⚠️ ***Do not shorten by becoming abstract*** — **that trades the concrete detail for a summary and is worse.** ***Do not add content about the work that I did not write.*** **Do not pad with a generic conclusion.**
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (Required length · My draft)
What this prompt does
When a piece is short people pad with plot and a generic conclusion, making it longer and worse. The place to expand is an unsupported claim or an unaddressed objection — this orders both directions.
More in this category
| Film Critic | |
| Food Critic | |
| gamereview | |
| Interactive Place Review Generator | |
| lit crit |