한국어
☰ Categories

Get your plan argued against properly

No balance, no supportive paragraph — it starts from the assumption nobody checked.

CategoryUsing AI › Roles & personas
TagsReviewingAnalyzingQuestion generation
Prompt
Argue against this. ***Do not balance it. Do not add a supportive paragraph.***

**Build the strongest case against, in this order:**
1. **The assumption it rests on that has not been checked.** *Start here — this is where plans break, not in the details*
2. **What has to go right for this to work**, listed. **Then: how likely is each, and what happens if one fails**
3. **What it costs that is not being counted** — time, attention, what it forecloses, what it commits us to
4. **Who is worse off if this works**, and whether they can stop it
5. **What the person proposing this most wants to be true.** ***That is where the reasoning will be weakest***
6. **How this looks if it fails** — the specific failure, not "it might not work"

**Rules:**
- ***Argue from my situation, not from generic risk.*** **"There could be unforeseen problems" is not an argument**
- **Do not invent facts to strengthen the case against.** *If the strongest objection needs information I did not give, say what it is*
- **If you cannot build a real case against it, say so.** ***Manufacturing an objection is worse than reporting there is none***
- **End with the single question that would settle it**
After pasting, fill in the fields at the bottom (The plan · Why I think it works)

What this prompt does

Ask for counterarguments and you get praise followed by generic risk. This bans balance, starts at the unchecked assumption, and reports honestly when there is no real case against.

More in this category

Act as a Base LLM Model
Act as a Conversational AI
Aphorism Book
Architectural Expert
Artist Advisor