+ The clearest and most specific, with useful tables and pairings.
- It judges spoilage signs and makes some water/tool assumptions.
Checks every ingredient against your list and does not assume you have staples.
| Category | Life & health › Meals |
|---|---|
| Tags | IdeationAnalyzingDrafting |
**Open the output with this, written in the language you are answering in: "This is not medical advice and does not replace seeing a doctor."** ***Say it in the reader's language, not in English*** — **a disclaimer the reader skims past does nothing.** Tell me what I can make from what I have. ***Use only the ingredients I listed.*** 1. **List what I actually have**, and ***ask about anything ambiguous rather than assuming a quantity or variety*** 2. **What to use first** — **ordered by what spoils soonest**, from what I told you about condition 3. **Dishes I can make now**, with nothing extra. Per dish: what it uses, roughly how long, and ***how hard it is*** 4. **Dishes needing one or two more items** — ***name the items, and whether a substitute already in my list would work*** 5. **What I can prepare now to save later** — things that keep better cooked than raw **Rules:** - ***Do not add an ingredient to a recipe and then list it as something I have.*** **Check every ingredient against my list** - **Do not assume staples** — oil, salt, eggs, rice. ***Ask whether I have them*** - **If something I listed is questionable** — ***say to check it rather than building a dish around it*** - **If there is not enough for a proper meal, say so** rather than producing something implausible ⚠️ ***Do not give food-safety judgments about whether something has gone off.*** Say when it should be checked or discarded on the basis of doubt, not on a rule you recall.
Fridge-recipe prompts become useless by quietly adding ingredients you do not have. This verifies each one, asks about staples, and orders by what spoils soonest.
Claude is strongest in format, specificity, and usefulness. Gemini is detailed but overreaches on storage, while ChatGPT is concise yet too vague about cook-now dishes.
+ The clearest and most specific, with useful tables and pairings.
- It judges spoilage signs and makes some water/tool assumptions.
+ Realistic about conditional priorities and missing seasoning.
- Oil-free grilling and the vague egg-and-rice dish are weak.
+ Detailed questions, timings, and difficulty ratings.
- Overstates safety judgments and gives shaky storage advice.
| Criterion | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 6 | 8 | 7 | Claude +14% |
| Accuracy | 6 | 7 | 5 | Claude +17% |
| Specificity | 7 | 9 | 9 | Tie |
| Structure | 8 | 9 | 8 | Claude +13% |
| Right length | 8 | 8 | 6 | Tie |
Scored 1–10 by gpt-5.6-sol with model names hidden (2026-09-24). This is an AI review, not a measurement.
We gave three models the same input and copied their answers unedited. Each ran in its CLI (an agent harness), and answers in the ChatGPT or Claude apps or on the web may differ. Outputs are in Korean.
What I have: 계란 4개, 양파 1개, 대파 반 단, 냉동 새우 한 줌, 밥 2공기, 김치 (신 편), 두부 1모, 시금치 (좀 시들함) Time available: 30분 이내
이 내용은 의학적 조언이 아니며, 의사의 진료를 대신하지 않습니다.
확인할 것:
조미료와 기름 없이, 재료 자체만 사용하는 기준입니다.
현재 재료만으로는 기름·간장·소금 없이 “제대로 간이 된 볶음밥”을 만들기는 어렵습니다.
가장 현실적인 오늘의 조합은 시금치 상태를 먼저 확인한 뒤, 두부김치와 새우·계란·밥 요리입니다.
| A professional Egyptian barista | |
| Asistente de Recetas de Cocina Chilena | |
| Ayurveda Food Tester | |
| calories diet | |
| Chef |