+ Clearly identifies the provided sources and access risks.
- Does not explicitly mark the status of all four parts.
Starts from the fact that Copilot picks its own sources when you do not name one.
| Category | Using AI › Microsoft Copilot |
|---|---|
| Tags | RewritingDraftingTemplate |
Rewrite my request in the four-part structure Microsoft documents for Copilot. **The four parts: goal / context / expectations / source. *Only the goal is required.*** 1. **Goal** — what Copilot should do. One verb, one deliverable 2. **Context** — why it is needed and who is involved 3. **Expectations** — who it is for, and in what tone or format 4. ***Source*** — **where to look.** ***This is the part that does not exist in a chat model.*** **In Copilot the source is not pasted text — it is a file, an email, a meeting, or a person you pick with `/`** **Then, the part that matters most:** - ***If I did not name a source, say so and ask which one.*** **Microsoft's own documentation says that when you do not point at something specific, Copilot chooses its own sources.** *That is how you get an answer built on the wrong document without knowing it* - **Which of my four parts are empty**, and **whether each empty one actually changes the output** — *do not pad the structure for its own sake* - **Where my request assumes Copilot can see something it cannot** — ***a local file, another mailbox, a document not in OneDrive or SharePoint*** ⚠️ ***Copilot changes fast. Do not state licence tiers, feature availability, limits, or which symbols work, from memory*** — **a guide written months ago is already wrong in places.** Write `[confirm in the tool]` and say where to check.
Microsoft documents goal, context, expectations, and source, with only the goal required. Source is the part chat models do not have — it is a file or email picked with `/`. Leave it out and Copilot chooses for you.
ChatGPT is the most faithful and concise. Gemini is structured but over-assumes, while [C] is missing.
+ Clearly identifies the provided sources and access risks.
- Does not explicitly mark the status of all four parts.
+ Organizes missing parts and access limits in a clear table.
- Invents tone, length, sections, and source examples.
| Criterion | ChatGPT | Gemini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 8 | 5 | ChatGPT +60% |
| Accuracy | 8 | 5 | ChatGPT +60% |
| Specificity | 9 | 7 | ChatGPT +29% |
| Structure | 9 | 8 | ChatGPT +13% |
| Right length | 8 | 4 | ChatGPT +100% |
Scored 1–10 by gpt-5.6-sol with model names hidden (2026-09-25). This is an AI review, not a measurement.
We gave three models the same input and copied their answers unedited. Each ran in its CLI (an agent harness), and answers in the ChatGPT or Claude apps or on the web may differ. Outputs are in Korean.
What I want Copilot to do: 이번 주 금요일 팀 워크숍 전에 지난 3개월 스프린트 회고 내용을 정리해서 팀장님께 보고할 요약본을 만들어줘 What it can see: 지난 3개월 팀 채널에 올라온 회고 게시글들, 그리고 스프린트별 회고 회의가 기록된 팀즈 채널 '개발2팀 회고'
요약하기 — 지난 3개월간의 스프린트 회고 내용을 팀장님께 보고할 요약본으로 정리해줘.
이번 주 금요일 팀 워크숍 전에 준비해야 하며, 개발2팀의 지난 3개월 스프린트 회고가 대상이다.
접근 가능한 자료로 다음을 지정함:
다만 특정 게시글이나 회의를 하나씩 지정한 것은 아닙니다. Copilot이 정확한 자료만 사용하도록 어떤 채널의 게시글과 어떤 회고 회의 기록을 포함할지 선택해 주세요. 자료를 지정하지 않으면 Copilot이 자체적으로 자료를 선택할 수 있습니다.
/로 자료를 지정하는 방식과 현재 지원 범위는 [confirm in the tool] — Copilot에서 /를 입력한 뒤 해당 Teams 채널, 게시글 또는 회의 기록이 검색·선택되는지 확인하세요.
로컬 파일, 다른 사람의 사서함, OneDrive나 SharePoint에 저장되지 않은 문서는 이 요청만으로 볼 수 있다고 가정하면 안 됩니다. 해당 자료를 포함하려면 Copilot에서 직접 지정하고 접근 권한을 확인해야 합니다.