+ Correctly stopped because the exact deadline date was unclear.
- Asking whether current savings count was unnecessary from context.
Says plainly when the goal is not achievable, and sets the recovery rule before the first missed month.
| Category | Money › Budgeting |
|---|---|
| Tags | AnalyzingDraftingChecklist |
**Open the output with this, written in the language you are answering in: "This is not financial advice and does not replace a professional."** ***Say it in the reader's language, not in English*** — **a disclaimer the reader skims past does nothing.** Work backwards from this goal to what has to happen. 1. **State the goal as a specific, checkable amount and date.** ***If either is vague, say so and stop*** — a vague goal cannot be worked backwards from 2. **Break the gap into intervals** — by month or by pay period. ***State the required rate as a formula I can apply, not as a number you calculated*** 3. **What has to change to reach that rate** — from my current spending, and **what each change costs me** 4. **Check whether it is achievable.** ***If it is not, say so plainly.*** **Then give the options: move the date, lower the target, or change something structural.** *Do not silently produce a plan that cannot work* 5. **Where it will go wrong** — the months with irregular costs, the predictable bad weeks 6. **What to do after a missed month** — ***decide it now.*** **One missed month abandons the goal unless the recovery rule already exists** **Also:** what I give up to do this, stated plainly. **A goal is a trade and the trade should be visible.** ⚠️ ***Do not calculate the required amount. Do not project or compound anything. Do not assume any rate of return.*** Use only what I gave you and write `[calculation needed]` for the rest.
Goals die at the first missed month because no recovery rule existed. This fixes the goal as a checkable amount and date, reports honestly when it cannot be reached, and assumes no rate of return.
Only ChatGPT recognized the ambiguous date and stopped as required. Gemini and Claude were detailed but violated the key stop condition, while Gemini also overreached with assumptions.
+ Correctly stopped because the exact deadline date was unclear.
- Asking whether current savings count was unnecessary from context.
+ Provided practical formulas and recovery rules tailored to the user.
- Ignored the stop rule and did not plainly decide feasibility.
+ Covered every requested area and made the trade-offs concrete.
- Continued despite the vague date and invented unsupported expenses.
| Criterion | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 10 | 5 | 5 | ChatGPT +100% |
| Accuracy | 9 | 7 | 6 | ChatGPT +29% |
| Specificity | 9 | 9 | 8 | Tie |
| Structure | 9 | 9 | 8 | Tie |
| Right length | 10 | 6 | 5 | ChatGPT +67% |
Scored 1–10 by gpt-5.6-sol with model names hidden (2026-09-24). This is an AI review, not a measurement.
We gave three models the same input and copied their answers unedited. Each ran in its CLI (an agent harness), and answers in the ChatGPT or Claude apps or on the web may differ. Outputs are in Korean.
The goal: 2028년 3월까지 결혼자금 겸 전세보증금 5,000만원 모으기 (현재 저축액 800만원) The deadline: 2028년 3월 (지금으로부터 약 18개월) My situation: 세전 월급 320만원, 실수령 약 280만원이고 월세 65만원, 적금 자동이체 40만원이 고정으로 빠져나갑니다. 나머지는 카드값과 생활비로 거의 소진되고, 디자인 외주 부업으로 가끔 월 20~30만원 정도 추가 수입이 생겨요.
이는 재정적 조언이 아니며 전문가의 조언을 대신하지 않습니다.
목표 금액은 5,000만 원으로 구체적입니다. 하지만 기한이 **“2028년 3월”**로만 제시되어 정확한 날짜가 아닙니다. 월초인지, 월말인지에 따라 필요한 저축 기간과 납입 횟수가 달라지므로 지금은 계획을 계산할 수 없습니다.
다음 두 가지를 정해 주세요.
정확한 날짜가 정해지면 월별 또는 급여일별 필요 저축률은 **[calculation needed]**로 표시해 계산 구조를 제시하겠습니다.
| Prepare a money conversation with a partner | |
| Find the spending you have not noticed | |
| Build a budget from what you actually spend | |
| Re-sort spending by what could have been different | |
| Audit your subscriptions |